Tuesday, September 11, 2018
Friday, September 7, 2018
Banking Laws: Contract Act. 1872 (Guarantee and Indemnity).
Banking Laws: Contract Act. 1872 (Guarantee and Indemnity).
Core Risk of the Bank
Core Risk of the Bank
‘Risk” means chance of possibility of danger. Risk is an essential factor that needs to be managed of kept at a minimum level.
There are seven areas of core risk:
01. Investment (Credit) Risk.
02. Asset & Liability / Balance sheet Risk.
03. Foreign Exchange Risk.
04. Internal Control & Compliance Risk
05. Money Laundering Risk.
06. I.T. Risk.
07. Environment Risk.
Credit / Investment Risk Grading (IRG)
wewb‡qvM SzwK n‡”Q e¨vs‡Ki Ab¨Zg SzwK| G SzwK we‡klb Kiv, cwigvc Kiv Ges †m Abymv‡i SzwK e¨e¯’vcbv e¨vs‡Ki wbR¯^ mv‡_©B AwZe Ri“ix| evsjv‡`k e¨vsK 2006 mv‡ji 31 †k gvP© †_‡K 100 †KvwU ev Z`ya© wewb‡qv‡Mi †¶‡Î wewb‡qvM SzwK web¨vm g¨vbyqvj (CRGM) eva¨ZvgyjK K‡i‡Q|
SzwK cwigv‡ci cÖ‡qvRbxqZv t
01. e¨vsK †Kvb wewb‡qvM w`‡e wKbv Zv wba©vib K‡i _v‡K|
02. wewb‡qv‡M MÖvn‡Ki SzwK wba©viY K‡i †m Abymv‡I Z`viKx Kiv|
03. SzwK Abymv‡i e¨vsK jvfevb n‡”Q wKbv Zv g~j¨vqb Kiv|
04. SzwK e¨e¯’vcbvq bZzb c`‡¶c †bqv|
05. SzwK Kgv‡bvi Rb¨ wewb‡qv‡Mi †¶Î, cwigvb, BZ¨vw` cwieZ©‡bi cwiKíbv Kiv|
SzwKi †gŠwjK Dcv`vb¸‡jv n‡jv wbæi“c t
01. Avw_©K SzwK (Financial Risk)
02. e¨vemvwqK SzwK (Business / Industry Risk)
03. e¨e¯’vcbv SzwK (Management Risk)
04. wbevcËv SzwK (Security Risk)
05. cvi¯úwiK m¤úK© SzwK (Relationship Risk)
Dc‡iv³ SzwKi †¶Î¸‡jv Avevi wewfbœ Dcv`v‡b MwVZ| H me Dcv`v‡bi Rb¨ wfbœ wfbœ SzwKi gvÎv wba©vib Kiv Av‡Q& me¸‡jv SzwKi †hvMdjB n‡”Q mswkó wewb‡qv‡Mi †gvU SzwK| wb‡æ SywKi †gŠwjK Dcv`vb¸‡jvi SzwKi gvÎv D‡jL Kiv n‡jv t
Total Marking: 100
A.
Financial Risk
|
1. Leverage:
|
15
|
|
2. Liquidity:
|
15
|
|
|
3. Profitability:
|
15
|
|
|
4. Coverage:
|
05
|
|
Total Score Financial Risk
|
50
|
B.
Business /
Industry Risk
|
1. Size of Business (Sales in BDT crore)
|
5
|
|
2. Age of Business
|
3
|
|
|
3. Business Outlook
|
3
|
|
|
4. Industry Growth
|
3
|
|
5. Market Competition
|
2
|
|
6. Entry/Exit Barriers
|
2
|
|
Total Score-Business/Industry Risk
|
18
|
C.
Management Risk
|
1. Experience
|
5
|
|
2. Second Line/Succession
|
4
|
|
|
3. Team Work
|
3
|
|
|
|
Total Management Risk
|
12
|
D.
Security Risk
|
1. Security Coverage (Primary)
|
4
|
|
2. Collateral coverage
|
3
|
|
|
3. Support (Guarantee)
|
2
|
|
|
4. Negative Lien on Collateral
|
1
|
|
5. No Collateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score- Security Risk
|
10
|
E.
Relationship Risk
|
1. Account Conduct
|
5
|
|
2. Utilization of limit
|
2
|
|
|
3. Compliance of Covenants/Conditions
|
2
|
|
|
4. Personal deposits
The extent to which the bank maintains a personal banking relationship with the key business sponsors/principals
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score- Relationship Risk
|
10
|
D‡jwLZ SzwKi wfwˇZ wewb‡qvM MÖvnK‡`i‡K wbæwjwLZ 8 fv‡M fvM Kiv hvq t
IRG = Investment Risk Grading.
|
Number
|
Grading
|
Short
|
Score
|
|
1.
|
Superior
|
SUP
|
Fully cash secured, secured by Government/International Bank Guarantee
|
|
2.
|
Good
|
GD
|
85 +
|
|
3.
|
Acceptable
|
ACCPT
|
75 - 84
|
|
4.
|
Marginal / Watch list
|
MG/WL
|
65 - 74
|
|
5.
|
Special Mention
|
SM
|
55 - 64
|
|
6.
|
Substandard
|
SS
|
45 - 54
|
|
7.
|
Doubtful
|
DF
|
35 - 44
|
|
8.
|
Bad & Loss
|
BL
|
< 35
|
| CREDIT RISK GRADING SCORE SHEET | ||||
| Reference No.: | SIBL/NAO/INV/2014/ | Date: | 5-Aug-13 | |
| Borrower | Siddik Garments | |||
| Group Name (if any) | Aggregate Score: | 75 | ||
| Branch: | Naogaon | |||
| Industry/Sector | Risk Grading: | Acceptable | ||
| Date of Financials | 1-Aug-13 | |||
| Completed by | Mohd. Akhter Hossain | |||
| Approved by | Md. Motiar Rahman | |||
| Number | Grading | Short | Score | |
| 1 | Superior | SUP | Fully cash secured, secured by government guarantee/international bank guarantee | |
| 2 | Good | GD | 85+ | |
| 3 | Acceptable | ACCPT | 75-84 | |
| 4 | Marginal/Watchlist | MG/WL | 65-74 | |
| 5 | Special Mention | SM | 55-64 | |
| 6 | Substandard | SS | 45-54 | |
| 7 | Doubtful | DF | 35-44 | |
| 8 | Bad/Loss | BL | <35 | |
| Criteria Weight | Parameter | Score | Actual Parameter | Score Obtained |
| A. Financial Risk 50% | ||||
| 1. Leverage: (15%) | Less than 0.25× | 15 | 0.00 | 15 |
| Debt Equity Ratio (×) - Times | 0.26× to 0.35 x | 14 | ||
| Total Liabilities to Tangible Net worth | 0.36× to 0.50 x | 13 | ||
| 0.51× to 0.75 x | 12 | |||
| All calculations should be based on | 0.76× to 1.25 x | 11 | ||
| annula financial statements of the | 1.26× to 2.00 x | 10 | ||
| borrower (audited preferred) | 2.01× to 2.50 x | 8 | ||
| 2.51× to 2.75 x | 7 | |||
| More than 2.75× | 0 | |||
| 2. Liquidity: (15%) | Greater than 2.74× | 15 | 1940.00 | 15 |
| Current Ratio (×) -Times | 2.50× to 2.74 x | 14 | ||
| Current Assets to Current Liabilities | 2.00× to 2.49 x | 13 | ||
| 1.50× to 1.99 x | 12 | |||
| 1.10× to 1.49 x | 11 | |||
| 0.90× to 1.09 x | 10 | |||
| 0.80× to 0.89 x | 8 | |||
| 0.70× to 0.79 x | 7 | |||
| Less than 0.70× | 0 | |||
| 3. Profitability: (15%) | Greater than 25% | 15 | 8.57% | 10 |
| Operating Profit Margin (%) | 20% to 24% | 14 | ||
| (Operating Profit/Sales) X 100 | 15% to 19% | 13 | ||
| 10% to 14% | 12 | |||
| 7% to 9% | 10 | |||
| 4% to 6% | 9 | |||
| 1% to 3% | 7 | |||
| Less than 1% | 0 | |||
| 4. Coverage: (5%) | ||||
| Interest Coverage Ratio (×) - Times | ||||
| Earning before interest & tax (EBIT) | More than 2.00× | 5 | 6.00 | 5 |
| Interest on debt | More than 1.51× Less than 2.00× | 4 | ||
| More than 1.25× Less than 1.50× | 3 | |||
| More than 1.00× Less than 1.24× | 2 | |||
| Less than 1.00× | 0 | |||
| Total Score- Financial Risk | 50 | 45 | ||
| B. Business/ Industry Risk 18% | ||||
| 1. Size of Business (in BDT crore) | > 60.00 | 5 | 0.55 | 0 |
| 30.00 – 59.99 | 4 | |||
| The size of the borrower's business | 10.00 – 29.99 | 3 | ||
| measured by the most recent year's | 5.00 - 9.99 | 2 | ||
| total sales. Preferably audited numbers. | 2.50 - 4.99 | 1 | ||
| < 2.50 | 0 | |||
| 2. Age of Business | > 10 Years | 3 | 12-জানু | 3 |
| > 5 - 10 Years | 2 | |||
| The number of years the borrower | 2 - 5 Years | 1 | ||
| engaged in the primary line of business | < 2 Years | 0 | ||
| 3. Business Outlook | Favorable | 3 | Stable | 2 |
| Critical assesment of medium term | Stable | 2 | ||
| prospects of industry, market share | Slightly Uncertain | 1 | ||
| and economic factors. | Cause for Concern | 0 | ||
| 4. Industry Growth | Strong (10%+) | 3 | Good (>5% - 10%) | 2 |
| Good (>5% - 10%) | 2 | |||
| Moderate (1%-5%) | 1 | |||
| No Growth (<1%) | 0 | |||
| 5. Market Competition | Dominant Player | 2 | Moderately Competitive | 1 |
| Moderately Competitive | 1 | |||
| Highly Competitive | 0 | |||
| 6. Entry/Exit Barriers | Difficult | 2 | Average | 1 |
| Average | 1 | |||
| Easy | 0 | |||
| Total Score- Business/Industry Risk | 18 | 6 | ||
| C. Management Risk 12% | ||||
| 1. Experience | More than 10 years in the related line of business | 5 | More than 10 years in the related line of business | 5 |
| Quality of management based on total | 5–10 years in the related line of business | 3 | ||
| # of years of experience of the senior | 1–5 years in the related line of business | 2 | ||
| management in the Industry. | No experience | 0 | ||
| 2. Second Line/ Succession | Ready Succession | 4 | Succession within 2-3 years | 2 |
| Succession within 1-2 years | 3 | |||
| Succession within 2-3 years | 2 | |||
| Succession in question | 0 | |||
| 3. Team Work | Very Good | 3 | Very Good | 3 |
| Moderate | 2 | |||
| Poor | 1 | |||
| Regular Conflict | 0 | |||
| Total Score- Management Risk | 12 | 10 | ||
| D. Security Risk 10% | ||||
| 1. Security Coverage (Primary) | Fully Pledged facilities/substantially cash covered / Reg. Mortg. for HBL | 4 | Simple hypothecation/Negative lien on assets | 1 |
| Registered Hypothecation (1st Charge/1st Pari passu Charge) | 3 | |||
| 2nd charge/Inferior charge | 2 | |||
| Simple hypothecation/Negative lien on assets | 1 | |||
| No security | 0 | |||
| 2. Collateral Coverage (Property Location) | Registered Mortgage on Municipal corporation/Prime Area property | 4 | Registered Mortgage on Pourashava/Semi-Urban area property | 3 |
| Registered Mortgage on Pourashava/Semi-Urban area property | 3 | |||
| Equitable Mortgage or No property but Plant and Machinery as collateral | 2 | |||
| Negative lien on collateral | 1 | |||
| No collateral | 0 | |||
| 3. Support (Guarantee) | Personal Guarantee with high net worth or Strong Corporate Guarantee | 2 | Personal Guarantees or Corporate Guarantee with average financial strength | 1 |
| Personal Guarantees or Corporate Guarantee with average financial strength | 1 | |||
| No support/guarantee | 0 | |||
| Total Score- Security Risk | 10 | 5 | ||
| E. Relationship Risk 10% | ||||
| 1. Account Conduct | More than 3 years Accounts with faultless record | 5 | Less than 3 years Accounts with faultless record | 4 |
| Less than 3 years Accounts with faultless record | 4 | |||
| Accounts having satisfactory dealings with some late payments. | 2 | |||
| Frequent Past dues & Irregular dealings in account | 0 | |||
| 2. Utilization of Limit | More than 100% | 2 | More than 100% | 2 |
| (actual/projection) | More than 60% | 1 | ||
| Less than 60% | 0 | |||
| 3. Compliance of Covenants / | Full Compliance | 2 | Full Compliance | 2 |
| Conditions | Some Non-Compliance | 1 | ||
| No Compliance | 0 | |||
| 4. Personal Deposits | Personal accounts of the key business Sponsors/ Principals are maintained in the bank, with significant deposits | 1 | Personal accounts of the key business Sponsors/ Principals are maintained in the bank, with significant deposits | 1 |
| No depository relationship | 0 | |||
| Total Score- Relationship Risk | 10 | 9 | ||
| Grand Total - All Risk | 100 | 75 | ||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

